neues Turner DHR

Ich habe das Foto mal eben schnell von mtbr.com gefischt. Dass das ein RFX sein könnte habe ich anhand der oben gezeigten Rahmen angenommen. Vielleicht ist es auch ein 5 Spot in Small, das RFX soll ja 1.5 Steuerrohr haben. Sorry, sollte ich da falsch liegen!

Egal, ich finde, ein in natura aufgebautes Bike sagt letztendlich mehr als texturierte 3D-Grafiken - und darum ging es mir ;)

Grüße
NoStyle
 
Ich habe mir mal die Mühe gemacht und die Geometriedaten für das DHR "übersetzt" (für Größe M, mit Gabel von 570mm Einbaulänge)

Cockpit(*): 437mm
Sitzrohr: 406mm
Steuerrohr: 109mm
Höhe über Alles: 762mm

*keine Ahnung was damit gemeint ist, aber ich glaube das wird vom Tretlager bis zum Steuerrohr gemessen.

Steuerrohr: 1.5
Lenkwinkel: 64.5
Sitzwinkel: NA
Sattelstütze: 30.9
Kettenstrebe: 442mm
Tretlager: 83mm
Tretlagerhöhe: 35.6cm
Federweg: 210mm
Dämpferhub: 76.2mm
Einbaulänge: 241mm
Hinterbau: 150*12mm
ISCG 05
Gewicht: 4,31kg (o. Dämpfer)

Farben: Gelb o. Schwarz
 
für die interresierten ein paar statements von Dave Weagle


From the Turner board on MTBR
Quote:
Originally Posted by _dw
Everyone who has spent time on the interwebs and cycling forums knows that the Turner homers are some of the most passionate and opinionated riders to ever ride and scrutinize a bicycle. As someone who thrives on riding and scrutinizing bicycles, I am thrilled to join your family.

Thanks to all of you who have sent kind words of support, encouragement, and excitement about the dw-link / Turner partnership. I’m as excited as you are. Many of you who know me, either in person or through years of talking on forums, know that Turner has been one of the brands that I’ve really looked up to since I first got into mountain bikes in the late ‘90s. I’ve always been a big fan of the Turner hallmarks of quality, straightforward design, and customer service. I think that this new dw-linked line really will help keep that tradition going. As a rider, I can say that the Turner dw-links are each as individually unique as the dw-link designs used by Ibis and Pivot. I urge you to test the bikes, whatever opinion you hold from a picture or prior experience will be backed up with real, live experience. I am looking forward to hearing all of the homer feedback. To that end, I’ll be available at the Turner, IBIS, and Pivot booths at Interbike and Dirt Demo for Q&A, general grilling, and hopefully a lot more talk about great rides than the finer points of rear suspension..

I’ve briefly scanned the hundreds and hundreds of posts / questions that have popped up since yesterday on the multitude of boards. I will try to answer some of the more commonly occurring questions that I saw.

- Can you switch links back and forth between different dw-link Turner models?

A: Nope, dw-link is a lot more reliant on specific pivot location and kinematic layout than FSR or TNT. The ability to tune and characterize dw-link’s comparatively complex anti-squat and wheel rate curves comes through closely calibrated suspension geometry. Even very small changes, less than 2mm, can have major and unplanned effects on performance.

- Will the Turner dw-links ride like other dw-link bikes that I have ridden?

A: The development of a new dw-link bike is a collaborative affair. For the Turner bikes, the process starts with frame geometry developed by DT himself. This is the first part that gives each bike a unique Turner personality. All dw-link bikes ever made share one common factor. I was responsible for the development of the suspension kinematics for each of these bikes. Whether it’s an Iron Horse, Ibis, Pivot, Turner, or IF, the how’s and why’s of the dw-link suspension begin and end here. So from one standpoint, the bikes are going to ride similarly in some respects, but for the most part they are all very different.

The heart of the dw-link system is its position sensitive anti-squat, and this is shared by all dw-link platforms. There is a very wide range of variability in wheel rate possible within the dw-link system, and I use this to help create each unique suspension bike’s personality. I work hand in hand with each manufacturer to help them realize their idea of what the ultimate suspension bike feels like on the trail. Based on the feedback that I gathered from talking with and riding with Dave Turner and his trusted advisors, I developed wheel rates and ultimately leverage rates to give us the “feel” that we were looking for.

The realization of these ideas on “feel” are what makes each bike special. For example, an Ibis Mojo was engineered to have a coil-like feel using a lightweight air shock, a Pivot Mach 4 was made to have a racy XC feel with very neutral braking, and a Turner 5-Spot was designed to eat small bumps and still take the big hit.

- I think that the bikes look sweet, ugly, like IH bikes, like a Turner, etc…

A: I think that this is another area that really lets a company like Turner showcase their abilities. If you put these bikes in a lineup of 100 frames, I could pick them out as Turners instantly. Round downtubes, CNC pivot blocks, bushing pivots, square chainstays and seatstays? I can think of only one manufacturer that combines these elements. The bikes are uniquely Turner, and in a world of swoops and forming I think that they are refreshing.

Someone commented that this is what the dw-link Iron Horse line would have looked like moving forward. To all of the you who commented really like the look of the Iron Horse dw-link bikes, thanks for the nice complement, these were my babies, and I developed every inch of them from the ground up. They were my first (and for now I am content to say last) attempt at styling a whole line. For sure there are things that I would have liked to do differently, but the situation at IH did not allow that. Either way, I am proud of those bikes and it was a great experience for me. If I had decided to allow IH to continue building dw-link bikes, they would have been much different looking than the Turner bikes. Aside from the general dw-link layout the similarities would have ended there.

- Is the DHR a new Sunday etc…

Back in 2000 and 2001, when I really was heavily into developing dw-link, I spent more time than I should have posting on the MTBR forums about the finer points of suspension design. During that time, the number one downhill bike that I recommended to riders was the DHR. I knew when I designed the Sunday that this was the benchmark. Since then it seems like the Sunday has become the new downhill benchmark, but I still thought that I could improve upon it based on my experience on the World Cup circuit and feedback from many talented riders. Think of the new DHR as an evolution of the ideas that made both the DHR and Sunday successful.

The things that I specifically put attention into with the new DHR include:

- a pretty nifty dual progressive leverage rate curve that is supple in the early travel, with the end travel ramp that the Sunday lacked.
- modified spring rates, so that a 155 lb rider will now use a 350lb spring rather than a 300lb spring. This will give lighter riders more tuning options.
- lighter weight layout. The Sunday was impressively light, but this bike’s frame takes it to a new level in my opinion. Alone it weighs in the 7’s, and in the low 8’s with shock. Its light and strong at the same time.

OK, I need to do some work here!

Cheers all!

Dave
 
kann man sich die neue Kollektion schon auf der Eurobike anschaun? Weiß da jemand was?

Dave Turner ist auf der Eurobike, im MTBR-Thread hat er sich von dort gemeldet:
Greetings from Eurobike! Glad most of you are enjoying the new line! As CC and his personal tow donkey Aqua will find out on the 5th, these new bikes ride fantastic. Wouldn't be spending this kind of time and headache if they didn't.

Love to stay and chat, but there is a line of people waiting to use the free computers.

DT

ps. The hefe is good and the salads are fair. Strudel of course is great everyday!
http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=448663
 
flux1.jpg


spot1.jpg


dw-link2.jpg


dw-link1.jpg
 
aus dem MTBR board
Dave Weagle schrieb:
Everyone who has spent time on the interwebs and cycling forums knows that the Turner homers are some of the most passionate and opinionated riders to ever ride and scrutinize a bicycle. As someone who thrives on riding and scrutinizing bicycles, I am thrilled to join your family.

Thanks to all of you who have sent kind words of support, encouragement, and excitement about the dw-link / Turner partnership. I’m as excited as you are. Many of you who know me, either in person or through years of talking on forums, know that Turner has been one of the brands that I’ve really looked up to since I first got into mountain bikes in the late ‘90s. I’ve always been a big fan of the Turner hallmarks of quality, straightforward design, and customer service. I think that this new dw-linked line really will help keep that tradition going. As a rider, I can say that the Turner dw-links are each as individually unique as the dw-link designs used by Ibis and Pivot. I urge you to test the bikes, whatever opinion you hold from a picture or prior experience will be backed up with real, live experience. I am looking forward to hearing all of the homer feedback. To that end, I’ll be available at the Turner, IBIS, and Pivot booths at Interbike and Dirt Demo for Q&A, general grilling, and hopefully a lot more talk about great rides than the finer points of rear suspension..

I’ve briefly scanned the hundreds and hundreds of posts / questions that have popped up since yesterday on the multitude of boards. I will try to answer some of the more commonly occurring questions that I saw.

- Can you switch links back and forth between different dw-link Turner models?

A: Nope, dw-link is a lot more reliant on specific pivot location and kinematic layout than FSR or TNT. The ability to tune and characterize dw-link’s comparatively complex anti-squat and wheel rate curves comes through closely calibrated suspension geometry. Even very small changes, less than 2mm, can have major and unplanned effects on performance.

- Will the Turner dw-links ride like other dw-link bikes that I have ridden?

A: The development of a new dw-link bike is a collaborative affair. For the Turner bikes, the process starts with frame geometry developed by DT himself. This is the first part that gives each bike a unique Turner personality. All dw-link bikes ever made share one common factor. I was responsible for the development of the suspension kinematics for each of these bikes. Whether it’s an Iron Horse, Ibis, Pivot, Turner, or IF, the how’s and why’s of the dw-link suspension begin and end here. So from one standpoint, the bikes are going to ride similarly in some respects, but for the most part they are all very different.

The heart of the dw-link system is its position sensitive anti-squat, and this is shared by all dw-link platforms. There is a very wide range of variability in wheel rate possible within the dw-link system, and I use this to help create each unique suspension bike’s personality. I work hand in hand with each manufacturer to help them realize their idea of what the ultimate suspension bike feels like on the trail. Based on the feedback that I gathered from talking with and riding with Dave Turner and his trusted advisors, I developed wheel rates and ultimately leverage rates to give us the “feel” that we were looking for.

The realization of these ideas on “feel” are what makes each bike special. For example, an Ibis Mojo was engineered to have a coil-like feel using a lightweight air shock, a Pivot Mach 4 was made to have a racy XC feel with very neutral braking, and a Turner 5-Spot was designed to eat small bumps and still take the big hit.

- I think that the bikes look sweet, ugly, like IH bikes, like a Turner, etc…

A: I think that this is another area that really lets a company like Turner showcase their abilities. If you put these bikes in a lineup of 100 frames, I could pick them out as Turners instantly. Round downtubes, CNC pivot blocks, bushing pivots, square chainstays and seatstays? I can think of only one manufacturer that combines these elements. The bikes are uniquely Turner, and in a world of swoops and forming I think that they are refreshing.

Someone commented that this is what the dw-link Iron Horse line would have looked like moving forward. To all of the you who commented really like the look of the Iron Horse dw-link bikes, thanks for the nice complement, these were my babies, and I developed every inch of them from the ground up. They were my first (and for now I am content to say last) attempt at styling a whole line. For sure there are things that I would have liked to do differently, but the situation at IH did not allow that. Either way, I am proud of those bikes and it was a great experience for me. If I had decided to allow IH to continue building dw-link bikes, they would have been much different looking than the Turner bikes. Aside from the general dw-link layout the similarities would have ended there.

- Is the DHR a new Sunday etc…

Back in 2000 and 2001, when I really was heavily into developing dw-link, I spent more time than I should have posting on the MTBR forums about the finer points of suspension design. During that time, the number one downhill bike that I recommended to riders was the DHR. I knew when I designed the Sunday that this was the benchmark. Since then it seems like the Sunday has become the new downhill benchmark, but I still thought that I could improve upon it based on my experience on the World Cup circuit and feedback from many talented riders. Think of the new DHR as an evolution of the ideas that made both the DHR and Sunday successful.

The things that I specifically put attention into with the new DHR include:

- a pretty nifty dual progressive leverage rate curve that is supple in the early travel, with the end travel ramp that the Sunday lacked.
- modified spring rates, so that a 155 lb rider will now use a 350lb spring rather than a 300lb spring. This will give lighter riders more tuning options.
- lighter weight layout. The Sunday was impressively light, but this bike’s frame takes it to a new level in my opinion. Alone it weighs in the 7’s, and in the low 8’s with shock. Its light and strong at the same time.

OK, I need to do some work here!

Cheers all!

Dave
sieht gut aus, anscheinend ist es auch leicht und was die funktion angeht bin ich auch zuversichtlich. würd mir schon gefallen so ein DHR. und wenn wir schon dabei sind hätt ich auch gern noch ein 5.spot. :D

ich hoffe dave tuner hat die bikes auf der eurobike dabei.
 
@Dropdead
Wie kommst du denn auf 4,31kg ohne Dämpfer?


lighter weight layout. The Sunday was impressively light, but this bike's frame takes it to a new level in my opinion. Alone it weighs in the 7's, and in the low 8's with shock. Its light and strong at the same time.
 
Bin ich der einzige, dem die komplette 2008 Modellpalette besser gefällt :confused:

sieht halt irgendwie garnichtmehr nach Turner aus, Schade und mit Sicherheit ein ziemlicher Schock für viele Turner Fans.


Gruß
Stefan
 
@Tyrolens
Puh ...;)


hab gerade mal im mtbr Turner Forum quergelesen. ich denke der Dave (besser beide Daves) wird da schon gut Gegenwind bekommen :D


Die 08 DHR' s werden übriges in USA momentan für umgerechnet ca. 1500€ verramscht.
 
gibts irgendwo schon indizien dafür, wie weit sich die preise nach oben entwickeln werden?
find die 09er rahmen spontan zwar äußerst schick, wenn die aber preislich unleistbar sein sollten, wär ein 08er für 1500€ auch ne äußerst attraktive option...
 
das 5 Spot soll scheins 350$ teurer werden (laut mtbr)

Ich denk beim DHR werdens eher 500$


Ist ja klar. Der DW will ja auch Geld sehen. Ausserdem sind die Rahmen natürlich aufwendiger.
 
hmja, dann wirds wohl in der region zwischen 3200$ und 3500$ landen, bei selbstimport also grob 2800€-2900€. da würde das 08er dann ja für 1000€ weniger hergehen...
 
soviel glaube ich jetzt nicht, aber mit knapp 3000 würde ich schon rechnen.

Selbstimport aus USA bringt bei Turner nicht viel, da die Preise überall fast gleich sind (so wars jedenfalls Anfang des Jahres)
 
Zurück
Oben Unten